Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1327

reference
882-tree-1
name
1327
tree-preservation-order

undefined

882-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013520 50.878345)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013464 50.878339,-1.013466 50.878351,-1.013474 50.878361,-1.013486 50.878369,-1.013502 50.878374,-1.013520 50.878376,-1.013537 50.878374,-1.013553 50.878369,-1.013566 50.878361,-1.013574 50.878351,-1.013577 50.878340,-1.013575 50.878329,-1.013567 50.878319,-1.013555 50.878311,-1.013539 50.878306,-1.013521 50.878304,-1.013504 50.878306,-1.013488 50.878310,-1.013475 50.878318,-1.013467 50.878328,-1.013464 50.878339)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL